Mid-winter reading round-up
Hands up: I finished reading two of these books weeks ago and have therefore forgotten almost everything about them. They all deserve full reviews but I’d have to reread the books for that to happen and, let’s face it, that’s not happening. So here are some woefully brief thoughts on the last few books that I’ve read. (Incidentally, my 2015 reading has started slowly. Goodreads tells me I am already behind. Stupid reading challenges.)
Dear Life
by Alice Munro
Munro writes beautiful short stories about everyday life in Canada, often set in or starting from the mid-20th century, and even the more modern settings have a timeless quality to them. There was a bit of a theme of passing through, of the people who are important to you for a while and then move on, which is not an easy theme to create satisfying endings from, but this never bothered me. I really liked the story “Amundsen”, about a woman who goes to a remote village to teach at a school that’s part of a tuberculosis sanatorium. It’s somehow very ordinary and very strange at the same time.
“The building, the trees, the lake, could never again be the same to me as they were on that first day, when I was caught by their mystery and authority. On that day I had believed myself invisible. Now it seemed as if that was never true.”
First published in Great Britain 2012 by Chatto & Windus.
Source: Foyles, Bristol.
The Dead Lake
by Hamid Ismailov
translated from Russian by Andrew Bromfield
This strange short book started out with so much eerie promise but it got a little boring in middle. In fact, I put it down for a month and wasn’t sure if I would pick it up again, but I’m glad that I did. The language is beautiful and the story almost a fairy tale. It’s about Yerzhan who lives in a remote part of Kazakhstan where the Soviets test atomic weapons. As a young boy he fell in love with the girl next door and one day, to impress her, he dived into a forbidden (and almost certainly radioactive) lake. The consequences of this action are odd and fantastical, which is fitting for such an empty, unsettling landscape.
“Yerzhan stood there with his heart pumping hard, pounding its rhythm against the wall – or was that the heavy passenger express that pounded on the rails with a rhythm that pulsed through the ground? Whatever the cause of the pounding, Yerzhan just stood there nailed to the floor, more dead than alive. And once again that same implacable, visceral fear rose up from his trembling knees to his stomach, where it stopped like a hot, heavy, aching lump.”
Published 2014 by Peirene Press.
Source: Peirene gave this away as a free e-book to newsletter subscribers.
Rivers of London
by Ben Aaronovitch
This had been recommended to me by basically everyone and we accidentally ended up with two copies of it, so I’ve been meaning to read it for a while. It’s the story of Peter Grant, constable for the Met, who at the start of the book is at the end of his probation, waiting to be assigned to a department, so his whole career could hinge on how he handles guarding a crime scene in Covent Garden. Which would be easier if this particular murder case didn’t appear to involve ghosts and all manner of strangeness. This book is a lot of fun. It explores fantasy, magic, policing, class, race, history and death, doing so with great humour and plenty of action. There are already four sequels, which I know people rave about as much as this first book.
“Rush hour was almost in full flood when I got on the train, and the carriage was crowded just short of the transition between the willing suspension of personal space and packed in like sardines…I was sending out mixed signals, the suit and reassuring countenance of my face going one way, the fact that I’d obviously been in a fight recently and was mixed race going the other. It’s a myth that Londoners are oblivious to one another on the tube: we’re hyper-aware of each other and are constantly revising our what-if scenarios and counter strategies.”
Published 2011 by Gollancz.
Source: Heffers Bookshop, Cambridge.
For mini-reviews, these look like pretty good reviews to me, but maybe because that’s I like short and to the point.
If you’re already behind on challenges, then why do them? Just wondering. Myself, I’ve given up on doing challenges and it helps me to focus on enjoying the reading more.
Bryan Thank you! And yes, I really only do the Goodreads Challenge to keep a count of the books I’ve read, but I should probably set it at a stupidly low number so I don’t get demoralised 🙂
I’m with Bryan. These look good for short reviews. Shorter is sometimes harder. I so easily get bogged down and end up writing nothing because my expectations are too big. I do sometimes almost reread books. I’m trying to rein myself in from that.
If you want to feel better, take a look at some of my reviews. I’m sometimes lucky to write an entire paragraph!
There! That’s better, isn’t it?
readerbuzz.blogspot.com